O HERE ADRESS THE HUMAN GOD, THE ZURVAN ET’ LIBER
first he “the Zurvan” had been known as the lord of all creatures and creation, let us observe his name from the view of the horizon, lord of space and time, to existence he is known as da-sein yet this is a creator and a human god , a new view from within and from without looking in— this the diotelos what is this new zurvan but one that has been conqured a lord now of beings that have created themselvews ( this there passport to godhood )
god of gods — the human god !
i was once hidden and i lead my flock i tended,
now i return i am not hidden,
i come to turn my sheep into goats,
and in blame innocence,
through the blame of the world freedom.
I am an atlas, and a door to many worlds…
ALOGENUS ( THE STRANGER )
Alogenus, I have come from the one , the good and the pluroma.. for this reason this world calls me a stranger…
That I have been heaven sent, none of you know where I have come from, that my life has been hell and the only heaven I’ve ever known is the heart of my wife. wisdom herself…
this stranger to the world and boychild, is he not the boychild Zarathustura, son of Ahorumazd he this “one“ and lord of wisdom is he not now invited to the garden of Hypsiphrone to bare wisdom to the world, is he not a stranger no more.
Alogenus, Dionysus, Amun, this forigner come home…
Etenmanenki heaven brought to earth, is this not the Eotic of the Zurvanic ? these lovers of the Kosmic, Saoshant and Anihatta…
T.S.Z. The return home :
O solitude ! you my home solitude! to long I have lived wildly in strange lands, not to return home to you in tears!
Now shake your finger at me as mothers do, now smile at me as mothers smile, now say only: “And who was that , who like a storm wind once stormed away from me ?
the earth is the meaning of the ubermench,
the havenly portrayed by its drive, love
as the drive of all knowledge, this
divine mother and “mater” the
experience of the divine, solitude , she
this sacred solitude, through which all
true individuality is born.
something existing that one cannot know, and that is at rest.
rather they are completely unknown aspects of him,
while he is much superior in beauty, than all good things .
and while he is universally unknowable in every respect,
and it is through them all that he is in them all. (Zurvan )
a greater maximum than every minimum and less than every minimum.
( the tightrope of the overman )
not only is he the unknowable knowledge that is proper to him,
he is also united in the ignorance that see’s him. (lamb of god / and volgolfrei one )
it was apropriate that you alone should know and that they with another, instead you shall lead them… ( the shepherd )
Samael the psychopomp and shadow of the goat for Azazel, the one to conqure, rider of the serpent in eden. the blessed she-king uzza
as in the last temptation of christ, it was Samael who tempted Christ with the boody apple of eden before its time, in the face of his austire truth that which bore fourth his beauty and glory the death of the cross.
in the garden of Hypisphrone did he not eat the bloody apple in victory and redemtion of all things worldly did he not drink from the wine of the bloody hymen and thus enter the trance of enlightenment, the extacy of enrapture, in the world he found the otherworldly and thus redeemed all life.
this worldy and otherworldly Arielic Zurvan.
in the passion is not reason derived in the artistic found creation derived of the otherworldly this imaginative one and creator, as the creator is defined by his creation, and thus the creator is his creation. this earthen Isis to al things i perport. is not the dicerment of volition the way to your garden. this intuition of heavenly apples.
TO ADDRESS THE TELIOLOGICAL ARGUMENT AND THE DIOTELOS, THE GOAL OF GOD , TO CREATE GODS .
what has been observed of teleology is the being in itself the “thing “ or object” weather with intention in its creators ideal or not , we have come to see a new god to see not one who desires obeadience of his creations but beings who obey them selves thus are self awere of there own ambitions and goals not simply atomatons of the creator but to become aware of there nature, and thus recraft there own , there own goal there own creation thus they have become self awere , they are creators and furthermore gods thus the god goal
and so lay the argument of the teliological demiurge and the diotelos, a god who desires servants and, a god who desires companions a god that desires gods …
it is interesting to notice is a relationship of cammand and efect, a object of causality ( this god of old ) how can one be considered a concious human or in control of there lives or fate in such a relatinship thay are not , they are a slave wereing the bondage of pacification and eturnal rewards of ilusion inexchange for the most palpable and honest relationship they could hold this very moment, to exist to be human this is the extolling reality and the god within. the subjective judge. to which all the world must accept or deny. power over themselves and the threshold of freedom.
alogenus the stanger, omeromos the home comer, my war is heaven sent my peace comes from the earth…
that i have come through reason you have not known me for i am of heaven did i not discover my reason through instinct, did i not discover them through the earth ? what do i not now do through my reason that i conqure hesperon ( chaos ) do i not now bring heaven down ( back ) to earth ?
no more stranger is he Alogenus, but Omoneres this homecomer, to the world he does return
(redeem).
Zarathustura of the Lion
O solitude ! You my home solitude ! Too long have I lived wildly in stange lands not to return home to you in tears !
Now shake your finger at me as mothers do, now smile at me as mothers smile, now say only: “And who was that, who like a storm wind once stormed away from me?—
—who departing cried : ‘I have sat with solitude too long, I have unlearned how to be silent!’ that —you have surely learned now? “O Zarathustura, I know everything, and that you were more forsaken amoung the many, you solidary one, than you ever were with me !
Friederick Nietzsche—thus spoke Zarathustura
this world to redeem the deep the infinite, what is greater than eturnity ? in involution of all heavenly orders, we return to the deep this mother the sorce of the all… more than the all, the sorce of the all…from the earthen moon and its own inword gaze was born the sun and all being, the ground of being other and goddess born god…
messiah the sun-moon being and nothingness in the act of adjoining the copulation of all existence, a lucid dream interpreting itself…the endless cycleing of the abyss of never producing the grapevine of life…this thing forever in and out of its self a holon never to be captured…
Too address the worldly and otherworldly the marrige of the Ophite and Arielic
to address the metaphysical interactions of being and nothingness, realm of the entirety and the depth of taneen and the existence of the arielic lion from which all that is being exists…
from non-being ( yesh ) to being creation takes place “yesh me-ayin” somthing from nothing,, from being to nothingness, creation takes place “ayin me-yesh” this has been the dynamic interaction of being and nothingness, from wich the worldly and otherworldly create each other,
existence preceeds (essence) nothingness, nothingnesss preceeds existence…
to briefly address the ophite or naasian in relation to this prossess…
that from being ushers nothingness, this had beeen the force that created god, the act of sophia that created the ground of being, that force that created the material world and existence, from existence came nothingness, and this was god.
who is he sorath the divil behind the sun in the face of existence conjuring fourth nothingness !
sophia in this same role created god, however from her opposite role of her own consort and son yalda bohu the son of the forms, did the memesis of pisitis take place and the creation of the universe and the material realm, it is postured by the naasians that the deep can never be conprehended through in this comparison it is clear it is holographicaly and via means of phenominological deduction, evidently true that nothingness and the deep are explicately clear and knowable by and through its opposite nature existence and vice versa. this is my primary notion of the zurvan this fulfrum and fork in the road of choice where god/ goddess is indeed evident as fact.
it has beeen felt only god has absolute existence and thus is soly responcible for the divine lifeforce without wich all would revert to nothingness, however the shakti piercing the viel of nothingness is feminine and the creator of god, therfore i see the two as and ocilation, much as in the emuna elish chaos kompf epic there is a entamantidromia of roles between order and chaos and being and nothingness as to the male and female. this here represented by marduk and tiamat, however it is this “dragon queen” tiamat that is here the great depth and ground of being.
ADDRESS THE MYTH OF SOPHIA AND YALDOBAOTH…
I am the eturnal silence that hears all things !
—Abzu
the notion that god is a golem is ierfanced in the secret book of john, Yaldobaoth “an aborted feotus”an incompleate substance lacking its female counterpart wisdom “asherah”, god is an inchoate as nietzsche put it.
this reckless desire to understand the virgin spirit on his own is something likened to sophias desire to create of her own will ie yaldobaoth, this however resulted in the crearion of the physical world (universe )
it is the deep the most primary question that is unknowable yet the drive of all answers and the answer of all questions, the origin of life, this inderect knowledge of the unknowable ( direct knowledge of god by the shadow of all being —
—god is nothing—a virginal unknown self or ego, does he not tke on the goddess to be known? this deepened wisdom of his essence, this hermaphrodite of mendes and matyre of all, does he not die to himself to be reborn again , to pass out of the void into individual existence,this monal this “I” this eheyeh, so estonched in the wisdom of the nihil.
is there beauty in the world ? is this a bad thing ? to find this here , individual existence, is it wrong to create and think for ones own pleasure ? or is all that is phenominal and tangible “evil”, if this is so how could one know anything, or even an intangible nuemanal or unknown god?
this desire to think and know for ones self , is much as the platonic teaching know thy self, and to its opposite nature the hebreic addage “only a fool leans on his own understanding” what if all of this is simply wrong?
if humans can know only sub-par of the absolute, why would it even exist, even as it does not, for what reason weould it create, as the imortal question, and man made in the likeness of god, how should man know god or would he even exist? what if the unknown in most literal terms “does not” and man is the only “existent” god or being the forebare of individual existence, driven by the imortal question of nothing and nihil his very self.
that sophia created of her own will, this was her fisrt fall from grace in the gnostic myth, yet what is the source of all true creators , to think for themselves, and the inspiration behind all daring philosophy ( the love of wisdom) thus Z.T.O.L. is the 1st existencial gnostic treatus, to mary the yawhistic and asheric, in the fact and observation asherah (sophia ) created Yahweh.
that Yalta bohu was created in the image of “individual will” and proclaimed “Ego” this was an inheritance bestowed by wisdom ( sophia )
it is prudent to futher note adonai was inherited through the phoenician adonis a “lord” term originating from the sumerian Damu… the consort and child of sophia..( Ishtar)
sophia the incarnant of the deep, thus her desire to create from herself alone.. so with her son the offspring of the good..
in sophia’s desire to create of hers elf she created purely egoicaly, thus in consiquence produced a being purely of the ego, and it new of no other world but this thus it proclaimed “have no other gods before me and out of ignorance, cast his own mother, from his temple and house, like the form of a golem it was and inchoate and absent of wisdom and the and the knowledge of the other gods, particulairely his mother and wife, he decended into saturn from tzedek, and became unrightious he became the god of ignorance rather than the forknowledge of his origin “wisdom” and the Iam worship “me” from the desire of his one people he forgot all people, and from the knolwedge of his mother he forgot himself that the one true god that he was his origin and what had created him was his self, and that rooted in the realm of nothingness, the epinoia of afterthought sophia, that he was born of his mother, and that she was hois very heart and soul the shakti he denied, yah in hebrew the I am is a female name and that of hochma.
it as from this great devide, that the houses of humanity rifted, and yahweh and asherah the ophite and arielic split apart, and in the name of one god created all dualism that abolished the monadic confluence and syzygy of Zurvan.
the deep, the monad, the bulk, nothing, eheyeh—
wisdom the hebreic Yah for which all men have been forbidden to ponder, for this reason we have been slaves to god and all angelic orders, weather deamon or below…
in the horizon of the infinite—
we have left the land and have embarked. we have burned our bridges behind us—indeed, we have gone fourth and destroyed the land behind us. now , little ship, look out ! beside you is the ocean: to be sure, it does not always roar, and at times it lies spread out like silk and gold reveries of graciousness. but hours will come when you will relize that it is infinite and that there is nothing more awsone than infinity. Oh poor bird that felt free and now strikes at the walls of its cage! woe, when you feel homesick for the land as if it offered more freedom—and no longer is there any “land”
—Freiderick Niezsche
the Zurvanic the Eotic these serpents of all knowledge and love, suspended they are married, in the accountability of the world, reason rendered, and fate turned on its head. this dark serpent of mystery transfigured as the dragon of heaven.
did not the sun rise today from the great depth, and put to death all death and as it dies, hearlds fourth the starry night ! this greavous moon bore fourth Phanes from her womb…
oruborus of return in all eturnity fate unlearned, at the perimiter of the deep, the serpent of eturnity, at the heart of the sun, the eye of all being, the endless cycle of flux…
the lamb beside the lion before the tree of all knowledge, has not the white eagle pearched at its mount and feasted at the guts of shai.. this bloody bird of paradise, bathing in the blood of accountability, of which all men are set free…
all heaven has now cast down its crown, the stars lie seated upon the earth, never more to the kings return.
am i not the lion of judah, and the seed of seth, what other way could the pyramid of all pyramids be married, the houses of the serpent and the lion ? the god of this world and the other, where upon heaven rests upon earth and the stars decend from above, this entemanenki and foundation of heaven upon earth, babylon, the prision made castle of the kingdom, without a solidary king that the kings of tomarow are philosophers and rule over none but themselves, that they are lovers of wisdom, and her creators, that wich wisdom loves the most, to create itself.
I am Ahrimanos and dajaal because i say “I see to believe” that israel has come to serve Kiyyun, and islam calls him beneficant…
upon this revolation i present the philological history as such :
jacob: grasps at the heal ( he decieves ) judas iscariot ( man of kerioth / falcehood )
god of israel, lion of judah ( Ariel yaldabaoth ) god of the this world…
judas was the 13th, the deamon of saturn the ruling star of israel, shabbatai and saboath
Esau : covered in red fur rose of sharon and rider of the serpent azazel , the one who is cast from the people and local, into desolation, his angel was samael, all this too was true of christ, he was the azazel he who rode the serpent of eden, both his blessing and birthright stolen, his angel too was samael, his shadow, untill he relized he did not seek vengence over his brother and must govern himself, too not be subject to angels and daemons. his star was jupiter, the one to overthrough saturn, satanael the mask of god that decieved the hebrew nation..
there is a second interpretation here that ishtar and wisdom stands upon two lions, one protects her, and the second through him she shows dominion over the left and right hands of god,
in the gospel of thomas there is a parabol of two lions one that becomes human by consuming the being of that man thus the man becomes animal, the second that becomes human that the man consumes to become sapient, or wise it is a reference to the ego of god and the fruit of knowledge,
thus i leave a new interpretation witch aids my argument of the zurvan, judas dydamos thomas the twin of jesus and true lion, the symbolic representation of the lion of judah, in his time, was the doubting thomas, the reasoning and egoic one who fained at belief whaen seeing jesus raised from the dead…
and so i posture just as the lamb raised from the dead, the realm of below instinct and belief into the land of the living that of reason and the sun of sol soul, so the ego must recreate or be maried to the essence, this is the sowing together of instinct or faith and reason, the seer and the believer, what nietzsche called the apollonian dionysian genius, the genius of the sun, the lamb of beleif bust lay beside the lion of doubt, or reason, that judas iscariot the man of falsehood embodied was the ancient worship of this other lion that of the monarchy and the state, and empiricism of the state, victory and servitute in the ideal of the world of apearance the flesh, that just as with the history of the abrahamic prophets and saviors had been called fourth to lead men away from this, israel islam and the whole of christianity to this day havenot grown out of this molt, that of shabbotai saturn and sorath.
the jewish poeple are my people as my name is michael there prince of light…but they have been worshipping the god of there enimies, satu, nintura, and saturn ( Kiyyun ) this is why they have been so long held under foot.
adonis tammuz, and damu, have always been associated with jupiter in the ancient world, the saboath or day of the lord, is his reign over death, over nothingness, the blackness of saturn, outer darkness, this is why the gnostics have accused israel of worshipping a falce god, they have. the god of israel spoke eheyeh, the god of the heart that god is within…
what socrates the gnostics and all lucifarians have not understood, it is not the mind that makes us intelligent , but the heart, our sense of self and gave rise to the mind this is what makes us human, our individuality. and why i am still with you…
the lamb and the lion must be married, and so why i speak heaven upon earth, what should stand between a swan a white eagle a falcon the horizon of the cygnus… the dawn of gods were all falce gods die…
this lion of judah and seed of seth, dressed in black adorned in flames, is not my hair red as blood red as fire, a human flame i bare…the red ribbon wrapped round my horn, like judas and set, to be hated by all, though like a lion in defiance....
Psalm 137
by the rivers of babyon
there we sat down
and we wept,
when we remembered Zion…
how can we sing the lords song
in a forign land?
if i forget thee, O jerusalam,
let my rightiousness wither
let my tongue cling to the roof of my mouth,
if i do not remember you
if i do not prefer jerusalem
over my highest joy.
to address the division of northern and southern kingdom dispora and pressence of paganism and monotheism, the rejection of seeing god even as with he pagan…
in 705 the northern kingdom was conquered by the assyrian king sargon the 3rd the israelites were captured and incultrated , a weak sence of monotheism made the possible, the ten tribes then disaperaed forever, it is my opinion precicely because pof there polytheism they are representitive of the remaining world religions that comprise the greater religions (house) of humanity.
the idea of temple worship had gone hand in hand with monist ideology, the two god and goddes sometimes along with the was so a certian symbol of “reunification” symboilic of poly and monist atonement.
later the asseyrians under king Sennacherib 681 tried to subdue the spouthern kingdom, it was unsuccessfull later 1 century, it was subdued by the babylonians jerusalem captured 597 the king exiled 10,000 aristocracy priest and warrior classes, with them the prophet Ezekiel his poem on the “king of tyre “ ( Hyram of tyre )was the 1st prototypical as the voice of god to satan, and seturn written from the entrenchment of babels occupation.
the destruction of jurusalem raised questions : was god defeated ? that he could not defend his own temple.if a nation was defeated what does that say about that god and his potency ?
without a temple how is it that god is to be worshiped without physical framework required by mosaic (biblical) law .
the principle follows disobay and you will be disperced.
yet this happened !st and 2nd , at the worship of the dogma and “holy Idols” and later by the incarnation of gods own son, the rejection of christ and by the his prophecy and forsight of his opwn death, and now again what will come the third temple, the tower of roark, that will be torn to the ground, for the worshiping of Kiyyun rather than the god with in the temple of the body and ego of man.
the temple and its rituals are an Idolitry, for the monument of men…
i from eden have been cursed for the sin of my father the devil, i am resproncible for what he has done as I have taken it upon my own back, is it my curse or a blessing? to shed lightand make right that my wound, and blindness are for others to see, the works of god bvreaking curses and crosses..
the jews were originaly exiled because they could not live with each other, the differences between dualism and monism , montheism and poly theism , so were they sent into the world to discover all the gods. that there god apeared to them through all the saviors of mankind.
the corralation of the zurvanic…
that the prophetic period lasted the extent of the monarchy in judaic history, other prophets came fourth amidst there decent people unrecognized by the priest class and out of the authority of nobiility yet that god found noble, and the jews rejected these like malikai and daniel were the priest kings that israel had not expected, and did not recognise that layed there rule under forigne rulers, not to realise that god had never broken his promise to them but that they had rejected there own prophets…
The cornerstone the builders rejected…(the new prophet and law tablet )
that the prophetic period lasted the extent and duration of the monarchy, and the words of the prophets served as a corerstone of ethics and absolutes. this was the first assertion of israel.
christ brought a new law tablet, thus he was the cornerstone that the builders rejected, and this was largely gnostic.
so do I not bare a new law tablet, a new kind of prophecy, and this that of human freedom. not gnostic or judaic, but the marrige of both.
just as with plato perverted the laws of socrates’ “one” and the divided line of the nues. did not mosus pervert the law of the eheyeh, to worship the solidary deity or god, instead of god, the ego and eheyeh itself.
thus says Cyrus king of persia :
the lord god of heaven has given me all the kingdoms of the earth and has charged me to build a house in jurusalem, which is in judah. who is there amoung you of his people go with him, and let him go up to his house in judah, and build the house of the lord god in israel.
cyrus was apointed by marduk to retore both judaia and his own temple as the riegne of babylon to set the foundation of heaven onto earth…this was symbolic of the 3rd temple and the dome on the rock mosque built accross from the other, and the marrage of the ophite and arielic, that of
angra-manyu and ahoru-mazda the zurvanite theology… of cyrus..
like samson and the philisteen womon, the jews even in there own prophecies have been destined to mary the pagan nations, it is preciely how the tribes are gathered, by the marrige of the houses of tammuz and ishtar, the yahwistic and the asheric, does from arabia and sparows from egypt orur future and past adjoin and one is met in the city of salem the moment of peace, this is the covenant between israel and islam..struggle and surrender the unity of opposites and meaning of being…
afirmed from and ancient historical perspective..
it is the merging of east and western cultures that created a melting pot so to speak that barriors and comunities “fell down” this merger of greek and Persian ideals formed much i believe of early gnostic religion, examples : Zostrinos, Alogenus, derived of zorastrianism, it is my belief this can happen again through not taking this “hellenism” as a threat. we can forge new religions create new spiritualities, the judaic and greek can and should be married, i see this as the first step toward mess-iah-nism the joining of opposites we now see as Israel and islam.
this new zurvan in the plaza in the agora and in the street of the world, all temples fall and the only monument left standing is man…priests burning runing into the streets, the mayham and greater nihil all self produced, by the worship of the god…
between the two temples the peace brought to terror by the “good” sun…that some hath called him sorath…in this does not lay upon the earth the rotten fig…
THE HAVEST OF THE EARTH…
to grant meaning to the nihil, the null, hell, is to conquer it and consecrate it as heaven such is the harvest of the earth and the meaning of life…