THE SAINT OF BLASPHOMY , MICHAEL THE VOLGELFREI HELEL…
what have i done but taught men to become gods, to climb the mountain of the most high, to conquer the self. and i teach this one must become god to become a god…
one must become an individual to have a self…
i would like to first in this document ( Z.O.T.L.) begin to identify precicely who i am , it had been spoken by christ the lamb will lay down beside the lion , it is clear that this lamb was christ and the ego in submission but what of the lion ? that one has been apollo and the other dionysus, in the words of nietzsche i will despose this identity to you and you may make your own mind who I am :
it was against morality that my insinct turned to this questionable book , long ago; it was an instinct that alingned its self with life, and that discovered for its self a fundamentaly opposite doctrine and valuation of life—purely artistic and anti-christian . what to call it? As a philologist and man of words i baptized it, not without taking some liberty—for who could claim to know the rightfull name of the antichrist? in the name of the greek god : I called it Dionysian.
do i not lure the faithful away with music, behold the sound of insight, the lyre of orpheus in triumph. the hammer of a wicked song…
the hammer of god shattering and sounding out all idols, revealing and pointing towards the eternal idol, mans very soul.
this lamb over come by his opposite a lion the panther of dionysus the diolectic of metaphysical entamantidromia of the to mega ergon. he who heralds the god goal the diotelos, and cygnus.
there is a reason “the god” is angered when man becomes a god. when he takes his own destiny into his hands would you like to know what it is , would you like to know why?
he is a tyrant, and your freedom he desires, he fears the loss of power in which he might gain over your self ( this power he covets , the will to life ) this is the crux and fulcrum, wisdom is freedom and the ability to reason and choose for yourself
that god is the ego one must awaken to and master there ego to become a god and it is this that is the source of all spirit and individuality for it is the ego that is the fountainhead of the soul.
there is a firm belief in the religions of{{ man }} that god}} is beyond our comprehension , if this be the case, how prey tell are we to ininterperet his will ie morals or divinity so far we have left this in the hands of priests , if these priests are suceptable to the same laws as the rest of us how and why do they know different , it is my opinion THEY DONT and to my beleief it is up to us the individual MAN to decied his own morality and meaning in life that there may be laws behind nature and a language behind the interpretation of truth and reason this too is a later argument that i will adress but for here i suffice to say down with the priest ! down with syrinx !
what says the lion of Zarathustura ,, once seth i fell in love i fell to earth and was crowned Michael the prince of the eos , the slayer of the great dragon god he who had hunted my wife the women of the dragon for this is my place slayer of all false gods and tyrants of kind , the adorer and worshiper of mother sophia my bride wisdom the Haketa . see her now lunar no more she is born into the day Ishtar is now her name this is my blasphomy i worship my bride , she is my mirrror for in her is my concience as it is in her alone that i have ever found any good in my self.
in this i dispell the mystery of this book of an insight that gives glory to wisdom, i insight and her my wisdom.
it is she my other that has tought me to love my self to look back in-word toward my heart and ego rather than as i had done my whole life staired out into the darkness of the pit she had tought me love, man or womon we all play these roles in life we all posses within our selves an ego and other , i have been blessed to been given an actual human being to share this with even if only for the briefist of moments , she had truly been a gift from god and surely my goddess.
it is love that has tought me this power of freedom…
the lunatic of gods creation is named so as he is the heritic of all taken reality, and breaker of old laws. he is the liber and helel.
is this not the lunatic believes in what no man can see !
does he not chase after illusions to discover the truth !
Michael the helel the shining and insane one, born into the age of water, is it not so fitting that he slipped from reason into the abyss of belief…
I am lucifer the blazing star of light which all men hate,
those who adore me are gods !
Jesus the secret book of thomas:
some people have wings but chase after what they can see…what is farther from the truth..
if existence and being is veritas ( truth ) and the I god and abyss its opposite he then is the presenter of truth this goddess, if this the case than god is an illusion as the opposite of truth , nothingness.
the I am is an illusion and the presenter of its opposite, thus god is an illusion.
spread golden Icarus the medigator of truth and illusion does he not cradle the noese in his heart , does he not call fourth the Eos “golden luster makes peace between the sun and moon.
to joshua yahwey was salvation and he denounced the demiurge now speaks michael and he slays the dragon… hear his exigeseic name neo prometheus !
Jesus the gnostic gospel of thomas :
one should not stop seeking until one finds, when when one finds they will be disturbed, when one is disturbed they will be amazed, and will reign over all.
the interpretation of Azlan:
god is a dragon that has enslaved man, he has been called Saturn , molech , and kiyyun, in the greek interpretation by the gnostic he is called yaltobaoth to the buddhist “mara”, the god of illusion and the world of phenomina, the tangible and experiential of fate and faith.
this god has demanded worship and adoration , for his own emboldenment distracting man from a god that might upset his authority and power,
this is the reason the gnostics refer to the god above god , that this being is a demigod, and a demon a trixter of sorts distracting mankind from this greater god this god is the self and lies within.
there is a reason “the god” is angered when man becomes a god. when he takes his own destiny into his hands would you like to know what it is , would you like to know why?
he is a tyrant, and your freedom he desires, he fears the loss of power in which he might gain over your self this is the crux and fulcrum, wisdom is freedom and the ability to reason and choose for yourself
that god is the ego one must awaken to and master there ego to become a god and it is this that is the source of all spirit and individuality for it is the ego that is the fountainhead of the soul.
i quote here with exigesis , “ the parabole of the good shepherd”
here inclosed the two schools of moksha, the drive to knowledge and the drive to belief…
to first addres the the thief of samael and the two schools of moksha..
that knowledge of self is knowledge of god, this has been the most ancient of wisdoms in the era of the wise,
plato:
know thyself
the gnostics :
knoledge of self is knowledge of god
AA:
to thine self be true..
this is the meaning of true moksha however the self is unseen and the greater humanity is plugged into the world of illusion. this obviscates the true self or god as it obstructs the light of the soul by consticting the lense iris or eye of the ego which is the lence through which we create reality, to know this is to see that man is a creator. and thus god.,
the self serving shepherd or ruler is a thief because he is unacountable to this and thus is a more preditorial type of sheep the kind that has atianed knowledge but is in deniel of it and so feeds on others . he has no sence of self worth or esteen as it is the self that is abnigated by him he is the collectivist and communist., the leach upon other mans acomplishment , and worse a commercer of there souls., the mosha of such a thief is aquired when one atains oneness with god while “dissolving the ego or soul this inturn creates a sence of dependency on god or others to suplant the void within, for this reason he is a paracite and thief.
the servant of the dragon the I am worship “me” the greater “we”..
for better or worse i will now address the true moksha by plato and christ and or “the good shepherd” —with exigesis …
no physician , in so far as he is a physician , considers his own good in what he proscribes , but the good of his patient; for the true physician, is also a ruler haveing the human body as a subject, ( without addressing “reductionism” / as plato did not yet understand freedom of will)
Azlan :
thus as the physicans of humanity us ye gods are wen not this new type of shepherd that who emancipates his sheep , does not this new god require the son , is not the creator difined by his creation this pregnacy and new world to come…is this not so ingrained in our being like a coiled worm in the heart of nothingness the desire and cogito.
Socraters:
so far as a ruler , considers or enjoins his own interest, but always in the interst of his subject or suitable to his art.
Thrasymachus :
because you fancy that the shepherd or cowherd fattens or tends the sheep or oxen, with a view of there own good, and not to the good of himself, or his master; and you further imagine that the rulers of the states , if they are true rulers, never think of there subjects as sheep. and they are not studying to there advantage day and night.
Azlan:
it is the interst of the shepherd to not simply tend to his sheep, but to emancipate them, that they may become shepherds this is the teaching of the bodisatvah , the teaching of zurvan . that the shepherd is the father and the two are one , the flux that the reasoning one is the ground of bieng the self of individuation the selfish drive turned toward his creation in selflessness in love.
Jesus:
here to address moksha.. (the good shepherd and his sheep ), the good = nothiongness the ego of the void.
very truely i tell you , pharaseas and anyone who does not ente the sheep pen by gate ( the ego ) but climbs in some other way , is a thief and a robber. the one who enters by the gate, is the shepherd of the sheep. the gate keeper opens the gate for him, and the sheep listen to his voice, he calls his own sheep by name . and leads them out.
I am the good shepherd, the good shepherd lays down his life for his sheep,
is he not found here “pure and wieghtness” conqured the spirit of gravity through which all things fall, this heart composed of light , does not the feather dance in his bosom !
i am the good shepherd ; I know my sheep and my sheep know me, just as the father knows me, just as I know the father, --and i lay down my life for my sheep. I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen, ( the remaining tribes of the earth) I must bring them also. they to wil hear my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd.
( the father of truth is the ground of being, the self, )
the reason the father loves me is because I lay down my life only to take it up agian ( niet. i go under that i might go over ) no one takes it form me , but i lay it down on my own accord, i have the authority to lay it down and to take it up again, this commandment i have recieved from my father.
the jews who heard these words were again divided, many of them said he is a demon possesed madman, why listen to him?
but others said “these are not the words of a demon can a demon open up the eyes of the blind? ( for man to see he is god ?)
jesus answered , “did i not tell you , but you would not believe. the works I do in my fathers name testify about me, but you do not believe because you are not my sheep .
my father who has giv``en them to me is greater than all, no one can snatch them out of my fathers hand, the father and I are one.
( these sheep now find themselves they are children of the father that the father is there adulthood , i can do nothing outside my fathers will, that of a postiori and fire of reason..
the jew persueud to stone him, of all i have shown you of my father why do you do this ,
we are not stoneing you out of any good work but for blasphomey, because you are a mere man claiming to be god..
is it not written in your law , ye are gods.
after this jesus crossed the river jordan, to the placed of his awakening of the father and pierced the “greater parakoth”.
Damu Zi Abzu…faithfull and legitament child of the deep, does he not fathom the unfathomable, does he not forever thirst for knowledge… this great emptiness from which all light ushers fourth
that I have divorced my self of the courts of heaven, this great crime ! that i seek to redeem all, divorvced of the powers and authorities of causality and death, this anarchist and judge without judgment that great ammoralist !
in sumation to this ancient bondage it is the fact that this diety is a willo the wisp and without direct evidence that validates the idol of god, it is the fact that that there is no god , that makes man free and more god. this is the final envy of the dragon or mahabraman. mans accountability over him-self this is the diomond the jewel of precence we are eather slave or free .. one is eather for or against us…
there is a firm belief in the religions of men that god is beyond our comprehension , if this be the case, how prey tell are we to ininterperet his will ie morals or divinity so far we have left this in the hands of priests , if these priests are suceptable to the same laws as the rest of us how and why do they know different , it is my opinion THEY DONT and to my beleief it is up to us the individual MAN to decied his own morality and meaning in life that there may be laws behind nature and a language behind the interpretation of truth and reason this too is a later argument that i will adress but for here i suffice to say down with the priest ! down with syrinx !
who is he the blasphemer, but the heretic of all faiths…
some will call me nimrod, as my speach is simaler to he, so he spoke it is not submission to god that brings happyness to man, or as if this is the goal of life but strength and power, it is mans own courage that brings him happyness. and no other acting on his behalf…
blasphamer i am i the volgelfrei for i worship my self, and by conquering myself, i find my wife, my adoration wisdom…
i am helel that i worship my self thus i luster , but only by controlling this luster could i produce the lighting of the ubermench ! what are you my Sophia but the lighting of my wisdom,
to this world we are outcast and heretic with this wisdom. let us blot out the eyes of the ignorant for in this day their blindness is willful and they will to drag us down to the pit.
what is this blasphemy this new type of god, the self and conscience, and as one who follows his own (self), for this reason i have dranken hemlock and for this reason nailed to a cross, banished from eden up to the new paradise of tomorrow, for this shall be my only refuge. this, the fire i bearer, of Heracletus and Sopdet. the bridge of the gods.
for these reasons i am the saint of blasphomey and the volgelfrei helel Michael he who slays the “dragon god”.
TO THE SACRED AND THE PROFANE , THE PROFOUND ONE WHO SPEAKS PROFANELY…
what said the prince of peace but , i bring fire sword and war ! ( he who has been cast out )
some may ask, is this man changing divine law ? Most certainly I am if you change the ethical you alter the metaphysical. it is consiquencial.
That I have been heaven sent, none of you know where I have come from, that my life has been hell and the only heaven I’ve ever known is the heart of my wife.
he cast out for making the secret known, who spoke the 72 laqnguages and united all man, such is the coming of the volgolfrei. who passes through hell to bring heaven to earth.
to alter the 72 languages, too place a new meaning upon life… that the Adamic must be spoken with a new tongue…
the second coming is found no where in the new testament, but rather is a fictician of christianity to disregard the pagan world, rather I say this; there are 48 syzygys , and 24 advents of the god goddess, messiah ( bread-moon / being- moon / being-nothingness )throughout judaic and pagan culture judaism and christianity alike have forgotten christs “other sheep” the remaining tribes of the earth, after the final advent of this age the tower will be completed, and man united as a common humanity. this the family of El .
listen to the words of my mouth, i will open by mouth and parabol; i will utter hidden things, things from the old—
i will open with mouth in parables, i will utter things hidden since the creation of the world.
what i address here is the concielment of knowledge that this hording of power or fear of enlightenment, to the human race has produced the great ignorance of humanity and a certian sence of war, for the sake of war, the tribalism of marality and the doul mind of man..
jesus was a teacher of a new doctrine, to each man his own , that is each man his own taecher. the secrets he brought sowed his death, and a destructon of the old world , making way for a new one , that is this old world that wished to keep things secret, for this reason he spoke “i bring fire sword and war !” that in the face of truth the old world destroys its self, that it is founded on secrecy and lies. here lay a new call to a new kind of warrior, a war against war, that the pigs will eat themselves
what the pharasea hid from man what the preist held in secret so doth jesus , set upon the mountian top a sun unto this world , and his word i bring fire sword and war, fire and sword the word of god and logos, and this war, that against ignorance !
i would like to briefly address the existence of the secret sociotys of our modern and ancient world,
form the temple of set to he freemasons i see no difference, they all serve the dragon, they all are agents of ignorance, i quote a sage i met through my brother sandalphon we call him james the wize,
“ we need teachers not preachers” let the priest i say be a thing of the past, that the soul is god and no man needs intervention for this..
jesus the gospel of thomas:
why have you been listening when at first you should have been speaking ?
“preach from the roofs what you hear with your ear. for no one lights a lamp and then puts it under a basket , nor does one put it in a hidden corner rather , one puts it on a stand so that all who come may see its light”.
THE VOLGOLFREI HELEL…
see him this firey light berried deep within the earth, this candle of existence, does he not mirror the heavenly abyss of daath ( the mind ) and the grinning skull of enlightenment. does not the lotus blossom from his crown ?
this yokeless one has he not eturnaly been set free ? Dionysus ! this prince of darkness, adorned in flame, does not the existent realm issue fourth from him to be adorned in the dawn.
who now ? this prince of light ? berried deep 3 days , clothed in black does not he berror the light ! is he not the scapegoat of the world !
Ishtar have you not redeemed me restored to my pearch of reason have you not restored my soul this Cygnes now swawn of the dawn this Eosphorus let us not now dance between the worlds, this tightrope of life have we not now only discovered in our death…
primordial chaos is the natural domain of the philosopher, wisdom, thus speaks the lover of wisdom. the suiter of truth does not love love, but loves wisdom, thus speaks the god of love a goddess within his heart…Damu Zi Abzu…the faithfull and true child of the abyss…
TO ADDRESS THE TEACHER OF HE GODS…
what does say the teacher of the gods man must be his own master teacher and god…
so spoke Socrates, we must educate ( lead out of ) to lead out of the cave of imprisionment, the abzu of Ea, how else could we know truth but by teaching and educating people of there ignorance, and to some it is a radiance like the sun ( redemption ) , others like lightning, that all should know the truth, though all may not hear, the shachles of denial, and bit of ignorance.
that each person, is his own teacher (master) yet education leads out of the cave, like the parabol and the dialectic, like shadow casting ( i refer here to the electron microscope however this too could relate to the alagory of the cave perhaps ), one can only infer the truth (like the inchoate of choice) each man must discover this for himself and within thus declairing his art, the horizon of new philosophy and science.
A BRIEF EXAMPLE OF THIS PHENOMINA in the time of christ
the decision to make the occult commonplace by jesus, was not well accepted not by his upbringing nor any of the secret sociotys he learned from, for example the mandaeans in many respects considered him a black pope, because of his decision to make the hidden revealed, to tear the viel in the temple ( metaphoricaly ) it was there beliefe that jesus caused the death of john the baptist and himself by disclosing such information , whom ( john the baptist , that is ) was there king of light ) it is clear to me these events took place because he challenged the institution and the demiurge
( the God ) and because of the freedom of knowledge granted to man the beast of the world killed him , the dragon and his servants , humanity. for this reasons among others do i call christ the saint of blasphomy, and the carrior of knowledge ie light. this great lucifer in proper form , and volgolfrei helel.
TO ADDRES THE ANCIENT IN A MODERN CONTEXT…
the preists of syrinx believed that they protect the world by keeping the truth hidden, that this knowledge would destroy mankind, christ and zarathustura ushered in a new type of man namely a god…so too is this old world destroyed as they say , and in its wake the foundation for a new one !
on the ruin of apostacy
the pharacease have taken the keys of knowledge, they do not enter nor they allow any to enter the halls of truth. i have stolen these keys, to hell and heaven, and bring down fire from above.
for these reasons do i call this book the book of adversity, because of the war it brings, that of one against ignorance , and the strife it insues , that the slaves cannot grasp there own freedom, and break the chains of there own familiarity and incarceration.
to briefly address the manadeans and the heracy of christ
alow me to lay a gorund work for what i wish to dispel here i will begin by addressing the nature of secret sociotys and the way in which i hold there contempt,
it was believed by the ancient hebrew pharaseas and levi priest class that the name of god was not to be spoken , a secret thing and that if it were it would bring about the end of the world , what was not understood is the nature of the name that it is a creative implament a conjecture, that dispels knowledge, the world that is to parish is the world of ignorance and it will be consumed in flames like the sun a great lighting will consume this world and because of the shamefull ignorance in the face of the light , that this should be known as denial this old world will parish and all those who opress and hoild to this lie,
thaty the secrets of the spirit have been kept form man , this is a farce no man can hide from the spirit it is the self. the nature of secret sociotys is that of deception even unto them selves they will not prosper from there secrets but be exploited by those who grant them the gods of our own creation, to this order man is a slave race being taught to worship kiyyun the theocratic state, of babel, however these things will come to an end . ignorance cannot hide the light anymore that can be bent the arrow of time , it has been done , but nature persists .
now i will address the relation of john the baptist and jesus of nazerith both keepers of this ancient knowledge what i afirm as the role of christ as that of prometheus , is that though he is not the serpent of the garden he did indeed pick up the torch of eden and steal fire from the ruling class or gods and give it to humanity, in the hope of there awakening , he knew they world not it was not the right age for this to occure , this i tell you is the age of aquarius and the water berror that not until man sees proof of the soul will he believe he has self , that god exists.
it was believed by the manadians that john the baptist was there king of light , in that he heralded the coming of the rose of sharon in its decent toward earth, but “great heracy and lie of christ” was that everyone may recieve it . much like the chuch of rome the marsh arabs would have the christ denie his wife “bride of christ” it was that through there condemnation of christ in that the fact that he told the truth that he condemned birth john the baptist and himself to death.
they have never known the lineage and histories of the boddisatvah or they would have spokje befor listened and never opend there mouth , translation they are the ignorant. and this whole world knows atleast by name the king of light.
in relation to john the baptist and jesus of naserith and the zurvan and sihkism ,
there is a concept in zorastrianism and sihkism called mir pir or heaven and earth ahuorumazed and ahramin in my philosophy i do not accept the yahwistic wholey or the gnostic there is a reason for both worlds john the baptist heralded earth and water his offering was the soul and essence, this is the instincts, represented by Maryam Pistis Sophia , thus translated by samael aun ware led as a drive to faith or belief not knowledge . the self or spirit or fire jesus represented the reason of enlightenment , only when they are joined can the orbit of sharon be achieved. and heaven be brought to earth, but all begins with the ego it is the first and the last, this transition though aproprietly timed is acheved through adversity , what act of individuality has not ever been of this nature, it is a mistake of judah and the new age comunity to think otherwise , and they know it.
sharon brought to earth — this is the story of william shakespears romeo and juliet, the marrage of the houses of enlil and enki , islam and israel , the houses of god and satan in mendes the power userped to man he must know the true kingdom without rulers and kings that we might find god within and rule responcibly over himself, this what i have forseen the prophecy of the unseen future , the diotelos and Zurvan.
TO ADDRESS THE REDEMPTION OF SATAN AND AND THE TRANSFIGURATION OF THE DRAGON…
it has been said , in order to meet god you must first encounter the devil…did not satan first reviel god to man ?
to quote the gospel of truth:
he is the shepherd who left behind the ninety-nine sheep that had not strayed and went in search of the one that was lost. he rejoiced when he found it . for ninety-nine is a number expressed in the left hand, (the names of Allah the gate of the ego and abyss ) but when another is found, the numerical sum is transfered to the right hand ( the name of the ineffible god wisdom the light from within). in this way what needs one more—that is right hand (the eturnal light or “lux aeturna” )—atracts what it needs, takes itfrom the left and brings it into the right ( the right clasped in left or “middle way” “neutral monism” ) , and so the number becomes one hundred.
this is the meaning and pronunciartion of these numbers.
the father is like that he labored on the sabaoth ( like the bodisatvah )for the sheep that he found fallen into the pit. he saved the life of the sheep and brought it up from the pit.
is not the beast a mans name and did not man becomes free when he was slain , or was he not transfigured ? form the ape of man into a god , is not the ninety nine names a bottomless pit that has forgotten the wisdom i speak of here , an eye that has closed its self made blind by its own arogance, had it not forgotten the light within this primordail love and that of the self. did not the dragon god not teach this to man to listen without speaking to obey without doing to exist without creating is this not the flock !
did not jesus himself experience this and if not how could he redeem a beast, man.
form “the god” to a god from the without to the within , this god is found within…
and if not to this day here me do I not emancipate man, when the sun dies, are not the stars born ? and jupiter not there herald, this abyss of light !
TO ADDRESS THE CHASTIZING POTTER WHO WITH IRON SEPTER DASHES THE CLAY
neo-prometheus… neo-jeremiah !
that Israel worshipped a foreign god and this god was an idol “the idol of god” ( Molech ) this great war of enlightenment Saturn against Jove , from secrecy to emancipation ,, the metaphysical idol that establishes the veil of dualism. the forboading of jeremiah !
here speaks the voice of the Eos conqureing father time he who handed the scycle to the devil , tear the veil ! tear the viel ! let the trees of eden establish the trinity of things to come. 3, 3, 3 and 9, the feminine and the drawing in of perfection. has it not been known truth is a women.,
this new man no longer clay he defies this potter of old, for he is his own ( his own proscribed teleology ) , for his body is a hidden clay and his self a first movement and architect.
no longer “the god” but a god and many, brought to equality in the eyes of this creator , this old god and idol this new god within the hamer of the lyre and the sculpture. this eos the twilight and death of the metaphysical idol, ( what has been called the animal god , the thing in of its self / it is a piece of art by the creator in his image thus after himself the animal god , this metaphysical idol and mahabrahman ) art is as much a living thing as so far as it takes after the life of the creator , and the awereness there in. as it is a pregnancy of the artist. ( this is as sartre called the being-for-itself ) the human-being seen in existencialism as his quote “ existencialism is a humanism vs the ancient theron of the beast, or herd ie “men” vs the “Man” or over-man.
it has been the worship of the flaming bull of Molech , who held captive his own daughter Asherah and like the bride of Israel sacrificed her children.
just as in the Ramayana, he took her by force to be his wife. it is she who is sheba she who is Magadalen and Sita , she the bride of christ !
that man has forgot his other half his very body, and essence, this intuition and instinct woman had been taken from his side and he incompleat, this goddess the substance of his being the feather of maat and truth herself…and wisdom herself…this eye of omnicience ! awaiting the light from within…
A FURTHER BLAPHOMEY AGAINST THE MEANINGLESSNESS OF LIFE…
that god existence is unfathomable the great inefable parabol, this paradox of what is seen and not … is not the null the great liberation and perchased by coniousness, and this must it not be governed by reason ?
in this book have i not broken the highest of hebraic law as i have depicted the divine, literaly numericaly philosophicaly and by geometry, i have created a portrait of the divine , my monumnet to the human spirit , this man god and godhood have i not shown it comes from women ? and this wisdom ? is she not a great void and asherah which validates existence. is this not the glory of man his very mind ? like in love does it she not rule over his thoughts ?
THE FINAL BLASPHOMY HE WHO IS THE DENIAL OF FAITH AND LORD…
“ergo ergo sum” behold i am a fatherless god as i create my self ! thus self created !
man is not a creature but a creator, and his first act of his creation is his self.
what is greater than to create your self ? it is the act of self creation that gives man agency and more makes him a god, man is a creator and not a creature, or he has no freedom of will.
to create some thing from nothing has this not been the definition of a creator thus fourth? what then is the achitect of the soul? did he not create existence from the void ? and this the only father, who does not exist ! am i not the existing one?
what could this new god be but born of man, and is he not the son of man?
ab-el this “great love” god, is he not the father of seth and he osiris ?
what is this new god, he believes in himself, is this not the father of truth and his offspring the sun?
this new doctrine is not my self the lord and concience , and the most holy what god could be placed over this would it not be inauthentic, and a act of denial…
one must search the depth of lies to find inefiible truth … have you not heard , god is dead ?
for a brief moment i would like to adress the ancient context of this, in kabbalah and what jesus refered to as the father ( or abba “mother-father ) is the crown chackra the place of reason that govers the heart the heart oon the other hand is “the son” ( or “sun” ) it is throught reason that we conqure and lay judgment of the god within, this again why he said i have no judgment but my fathers judgment, that of reason. reason governs the passions. however borth are refered to as “the self’ one higher and one lower ( or inner ) the lower or inerself is the ego which gives rise to the reason of the mind and the mind allows one to peer into the heart, however the heart ( the ego ) creates the a priori of the soul, and thus is the creator or the eheyeh “the existing one” as hegel and nietzsche put it “desire is the drive to the cogito” and the prime mover that is the eros and the word made flesh, god in the world and the beauty of the world, for this reason i propose a religion of the heart. though ruled by the mind, it is as i have said “the austire beautiful. but the father and the sun are one. and this is Eotism.
to the orthodox view of the faithfull they have held to the position of the mystic that contact with god is held through trancendence not oimmanance that is to say man must suplicate through oricia and angel that no man or any being of the earth can directly know or contact the divne, only faith allows access to the god,
however form a majikal position imanance preceeds trancendence as to this understanding of the real , or reality through the will of the mind , that is to say the mental we have diresct knowledge of reality as some believe god is the self, self knowledge becomes knowledge of god, and through this the world is set in motion. , that the divine and the self are identical the the mental abyss of knowlege that calls fourth reason. thus a man of faith believes the man of gnosis knows. this is the secret heracy of the brahmins , which jesus apealed to and was cast of of there priesthoods for , this is the gnostic argument thaat roman christianity , distroyed in genocidal actions to protect there own power , this is the worship of wisdom the goddess vemachara left hand path,
some have said follow the heart. i have heard the mind is the way, is not the way the path, do we not follow the path to the heart, is this not the persuite of the spirit ?
i wish to be called a god rather than “the god”. rather everyone has a right to god, it is the heart of the tree of life and the ego of the soul that is overcome by wisdom and sets the soul fee, this i call salvation. an activity of the mind. behold I am a herald.
Azlan:
one came before me and he did not speak of his own authority, I have come of my own and speak clear as day, i speak from the heart.
once it was said woe to he who is without a helper , now let it be heard joy to he who helps himself..
jesus:
he who drinks of my mouth will speak my word and voice..
a modern day delema of this anomoly is the orthodox christian view that “jesus is lord” or “master” when infact on many occasion he has insinuated that man is his own master , the man of faith calls the dioty master , the man of gnosis calls himself master this was the greatest heracy of christ . direct knoledge of the absolute through the self.what so many existencial 20th century writers have said and have been labled athiests for , this is the king of kings , a king over kings and a master of self. he does not rule through the kings he robs them of there crowns.
am i not the sea and lake from which the sol ( soul ) arises, and what is more infinate than this?
that this is wisdom , and what is more infinite than this , let us not put a steak in our horizon and not forget the prosses of wisdom, i crown her alethea !
ON KIYYUN THE DRAGON OF FATE…
many will say, god is the gates of damnation ? Surely this man is the devil, but the god this world worships is the dragon of fate, the very one I have swarn to slay, as to the god of christ Israel and even certian gnosticc conjecture is a god within. the god called self and ego, the very thing that begets choice, a god within is what I herald the ego of the I am.
as for myself this “antichrist” as some have called me, I am Adonis, Damu the lover of Innana the eastern star is my wisdom she who calls back from death. I am the savior of the world, she is mine. she is the world i found beauty in, though to only inherit death. for this rerason i am not of this world, but want only to be in hers am i not the most tragic god
DRAPED IN BLACK ADONED IN FLAMES..THE BLACK SHEEP WITH THE HEAD OF THE LION…(SAMSON AND DAN )
behold a golden sun and a black sheep, did i not desire to marry the pagan ? and pull honey from my own heart ( the lion) did i not wrestle and subdue the lion to be the abandoned one ? and in my islation topple Dagons temple upon my head, this suicidal victor ! and conquering lion with firey locks…am i not Arimilius the Ariel of Dan sent to redeem judah…
have you heard of the slaves of god ? they are consumed by the lion…
i speak to you of the master of self that ate from the lions heart, the honey of existence…and hence became god !
I am not the man who god made manifest but god who made himself manifest, i am Michael the god of Israel come to ransom man from the dragon of yore !
that I have choosen individuality over unity thus i am a god of war, but of that a spiritual one. I found peace in conflict.
is this not a unity in individuality ?
and the agon of life…
it is the self i call god not the soul “the essence” what gives us personality and individuality and creativity, this i call the creator. the ‘I’ and ego in sum…